First of all, it doesn't matter who is better between Maradona and Pele. Second of all, I barely caught either one of them play as well. And finally, it is impossible to tell who was really better between Maradona and Pele for the simple fact that neither one played against each other. Right, those criteria puts that argument aside - of course, Riquelme, you're Argentine, so you'd say Maradona..no doubt, which is why you'd say you're the best player in the world.
As far as Ronaldinho is concerned, i like him. However, as far as his reliability in the World Cup is concerned, fine, but who actually delivered in that World Cup when their country needed them most? Bare in mind, they were filing through the Italian players to decide which one should get the accolade of most valuable player and names like Materazzi, Nesta, Pirlo and Luca Toni were in the hat.
Juan Roman Riquelme vs Ronaldinho Gaucho ~ Argentina vs Brazil ~ Pragmatic vs Flair: Both these players, representing their National teams, are surrounded by a host of superstars. In fact, Argentina's teams are perhaps more current stars that Brazil's "once were" stars, yet the result - neither won the World Cup. We went over this again and again and we pretty much knew and predicted that what would've happened to Riquelme did. Ac Milan, Inter Milan, Chelsea, Manchester United and even one or two wishful thinking clubs still want Ronaldinho every summer since his "failed" World Cup, yet Riquelme who carried Argentina on his back finds it difficult to get the same job offers. I am not a professional football analyst, but this tells me that the movers and shakers in the industry prefer Ronaldinho to Riquelme although, in all honesty, some of those team could do with midfield reinforcement.
Frank Lampard is an idiot, should've left Chelsea while his stock was high and could've tricked many teams into wasting money on him. It seems rather likely that both Giovinco and Diego will end up and Juventus. There's no sense hiding from the fact - Juventus need to upgrade their team! Trezeguet, Del Piero, Nedved, Iaquinta etc will get most teams to compete in the top 6 in Italy almost with surity, but Juventus is a club that needs to beat both Milan clubs and the Roman clubs to be #1 in Italy and currently they cannot do that AND still consistently beat the clubs outside that top 6. Diego may get better at Juventus, so perhaps both Juventus and Diego need each other like Ronaldinho and Barcelona or Ribery and let's say Bayern Munich, but Juventus needs to offload Claudio Ranieri really. He is doing as much as he is capable of, getting good teams to finish in the top 4 and even that is questionable since Milan WILL MOST DEFINITELY finish in the top 4, hence leaving a scramble if they play to their potential and go higher than 4th.
Now, this South American league vs Europe. Let us not get confused by, about four top clubs in South America and about 20 top clubs in Europe. Yes, Boca Juniors and a few other clubs of similar status can compete with Ac Milan and the likes, but it is a different kettle of fish to forget that Ac Milan and the likes include: Real Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia?, Sevilla?, Juventus, Inter Milan, Ac Milan, Roma, Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal, Porto, Benfica, Sporting Lisbon, Lyon, Celtic and Rangers, Bayern Munich, Ajax and PSV, Fenerbache and even more: 21 plus top rated clubs with at least 10 Superstar clubs compared to as much as 10 real contending South American clubs. You don't find players like Eto'o and Drogba in South America and if you do find similar players, then you have trouble finding remainding players to compare to Raul, Ruud, Ronaldo etc. Furthermore, let us not kid ourselves, these players get better when they come to Europe, so don't use the argeument that Crespo, Ronaldo etc came from South America. EVEN if we took La Liga and compared it directly with the Argentine clasura, you'd find it very hard to get teams to compare equitably with teams that are 6th to 10th place in the table.
The quality speaks for itself even if we only use Serie A and La Liga. However, in all fairness to the Bundesliga, Eredevisie, Ligue 1, EPL, Superliga etc. Europe is bigger and the absolute number of quality players are clearly more. When last has a national team from South America named 7 players in their starting line-up playing in South America won a World Cup or gotten to a semi- final as compared to European counterparts. The difference is glaring and has nothing to do with money or style.
And now, cross-referencing your comments with that and how Maradona played in the best league at the time. Which do you say is the best league now? And if it isn't La Liga or Serie A, what changed since Maradona? Why was Serie A the best league at that time? I ask this because it seems that you've contradicted yourself yet again for the sake of making your point on several fronts. Maradona made up part of the dream team and the best trio in Serie A at Napoli according to references drawn when comparing Eto'o, Ronaldinho and Messi which relates to your comments on Ronaldinho and star-studded teams. Conveniently, you recognise that, "back then", Serie A was the best league and so suggesting in your tone that Maradona was obviously better than Pele. While you attempt to downplay the quality of Pele's league, you fail to recognise that these said home-trained players won World Cups.
You can only beat what you are you given...
JOGO BONITA!