Have you ever heard how Inter fans, or better said Ronaldo-Fans describe Ronaldo? No? Well, the most popular remarks go like this; "No one could touch him in his time with Inter, the best player of all-times when he played for Barcelona and Inter." Yeah, well I think that's too far-out, it's a mythical description of an outstanding player, but is an exagerated description nonetheless. Ronaldo played with his well known Brazilian style, he was a prolific scorer, and was explosive, and that's about it. Ronaldo's one of the best players of the last 20 years, but stating he's one of the top-ten best players of all-time is very far-out. There are a lot of players in the history of the game who have been better, players like Pele, Diego Maradona, Alfredo di Stefano, Johan Cruijff, Ferenc Puskas, Franz Beckenbauer, George Best, have all been better players. And Roberto Baggio, Luis Figo, Raul, Zinedine Zidane, Alessandro Del Piero, Roberto Carlos, David Beckham, Eric Cantona, Juan Roman Riquelme, Henrik Larsson, Paolo Maldini, Fernando Hierro, Ruud Van Nistelrooy, Deco, Rivaldo, and many others have enjoyed more success in their club careers.
And as for Ronaldo's international career, incredible record, two World Cup finals, one World Cup Title, and Top-Scorer in World Cup history (finally breaking Gerd Muller's record). But it would be unfair to overlooke Bebeto's and Rivaldo's contributions in the 1998 World Cup. It would be even more foolish to ignore that Rivaldo was the best player of the 2002 World Cup, scoring 5 goals and making plenty of assists. The bottom line about Ronaldo's international career is that he's been an outstanding player for Brazil, one of the best, but he never accomplished something similar to what Diego Maradona did in 1986, or what Mario Kempes did in 1978, or what Roberto Baggio did in 1994.
So anyways, I've read too many times how successful Ronaldo has been in his club career, how he's never failed at any club, and I've always thought about those statements as undeserved. Let's see "The Phenomenon's" club career, Ronaldo started his career at Brazilian club Cruzeiro, where he scored 12 Goals in 13 Appearances and won the Brazilian Cup in 1993. After this PSV Eindhoven signed the promising star for US$6 million, and Ronaldo repaid them by scoring 42 Goals in 46 Appearances but failing to win the 'Eredivisie'. After two seasons with PSV (1994-1996), Barcelona signed the player, and at Barcelona he showed tremendous form but once again failed to win 'the important trophies'. His time with Barcelona was outstanding, but he only played one season, 1996-1997, and in that season he didn't acomplished much. He failed to win the Spanish La Liga, the Copa del Rey, and the Champions League.
After only one year at Barcelona, he signed for Inter, and it was at Inter that Ronaldo's short-comings showed once again. Everyone one talks about Ronaldo's mythical form in Inter, but what did he accomplished with Inter?? He played five years for Inter, 1997-2002, and he only made 69 Appearances. Yes he scored 49 Goals, but he only made 69 Appearances in 50 Months!! and to make it worst he only won the UEFA Cup (1998), What's so amazing about that?? And finally, after practically not playing for Inter between 1999-2002, Ronaldo back-stabed Inter with a controversial move to the Bernabeu. Ronaldo signed for Real Madrid in 2002, and managed to win an Intercontinental Cup in 2002 (in wich he was player of the match), and a La Liga Title in season 2002-03. Along with the UEFA Cup This are and remain the only 'Prestigious Club Titles' Ronaldo as won in club football. Nevertheless, Ronaldo played for Real Madrid five seasons, and never won a Copa del Rey with them, nor a Champions League. As a matter of fact, Ronaldo as never reached a Champions League Final, wich makes his 'successfull club career' remarks questionable. And at AC Milan?? Started of well with 7 Goals in 14 Appearances, but once again is showing his injury issues. Only making 14 Appearances in 5 or 6 Months, looks like this will be another Inter-like-dissapointment. Ronaldo's club career serves as a remainder that scoring goals and actually achieving something are two completely different things, and as for the goals (Ronaldo, 227 in his club career), there are plenty of players who have scored the same or more, players like Roberto Baggio (318 club career goals), Gabriel Batistuta (299 club career goals), and many others.
No one can question Ronaldo's class, he's a great striker, one of the best of this era. But his club career is far from successful, Ronaldo falled short from expectations at both Inter and Real Madrid, Ronaldo as never reached a Champions League Final, and Ronaldo has only won one League Title in his career (that is La Liga, 2002-2003). Surely his International career's been one to remember, but his club career is quite an indifferent one, as Ronaldo as failed to make the history books of PSV Eindhoven, FC Barcelona, Inter, and Real Madrid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
¿Do you think Ronaldo's 3 'World Player of the Year' awards are well deserved?
My answer to that question is no. Samuel Eto'o scored more goals, made more assists, and he never won The FIFA 'World Player of the Year' Award. In fact, Samuel Eto'o became the first 'La Liga' player since 1990 to score fifty goals over two seasons during the 2005-06 campaign, and what's more Eto'o actualy acomplished something with Barcelona, he won 2 La Liga Titles (2005, and 2006) and 1 Champions League (2006).
¿Why didn't Samuel Eto'o won a single World Player of the Year award?
I honestly have no idea, although I think there's no justification for it. On the other hand the other Barcelona player, the Brazilian one, Ronaldinho won two consecutive FIFA World Player of the Year awards (2004, 2005). I think Samuel Eto'o deserved at least one of those awards, but it seems that the 'FIFA Award' haves a huge inclination towards Brazilian players. I mean, look at the stats:
Samuel Eto'o - 2004-05/ FC Barcelona, 29 Goals, and 0 Assists.
Ronaldinho - 2004-05/ FC Bracelona, 15 Goals, and 0 Assists.
Samuel Eto'o - 2005-06/ FC Barcelona, 32 Goals, and 9 Assists.
Ronaldinho - 2005-06/ FC Barcelona, 25 Goals, and 17 Assists.
According to the statictics, Samuel Eto'o should've won the FIFA 'World Player of the Year' award at least in 2004. And Eto'o was just as outstanding in his performances as in his statistics, so this are not just statistics. There's no justification for Ronaldinho's World Player of the Year award in 2004, yeah Dinho deserved in 2005, but Eto'o deserved the other one (2004), and if it wasn't Eto'o it should have gone to Deco who won the UEFA Champions League and the Portuguese Liga in 2004 with FC Porto. And as a matter of fact, FC Barcelona as failed to win a single trophy without Samuel Eto'o, this happened in 2003 (when Ronaldinho played without Samuel Eto'o and Deco), and in 2007 (when Eto'o was out injured for most of the season). Just a remainder that Xavi distributed the play, Deco did the hard-work, Samuel Eto'o scored the goals, and Ronaldinho was the show.
Is there a reasonable explanation for Ronaldo winning 3 World Player of the Year awards, and for Ronaldinho winning 2 consecutive World Player of the Year awards, while players like Francesco Totti, Thierry Henry, Steven Gerrard, Deco, Samuel Eto'o, and many others have never won it?? What do you/the 'goal community' think?? Is it fair?? or is it biased??
Johan Cruijff; "Simple football is the most beautiful. But playing simple football is the hardest thing".