Handicapping the World Cup 2018 With 2010 set -- at least until FIFA realizes South Africa won't be ready and moves the best three weeks ever back to Deutschland -- and Brazil running away with 2014 (PARTY TIME!), the Nooner turns his attention towards handicapping the field for 2018. Without further Adu…

England (8-5 before Blatter's comments, 4-1 after) -- By then, they will finally have solved the hooligan problem. Plus, the country deserves to get some pleasure out of the game it "invented." It's not like the team's going to win the damn thing anytime soon.

U.S. (3-1) -- Americans aren't good at waiting. It will have been 24 years since we last hosted the tournament. That's absurd. Sure, it's only 4 World Cups between ones on U.S. soil, but why should other countries get to have all the fun? We're the big brother who always gets his way. Plus, we'll be done paying off Beck's contract by then, so we're ready to throw a ridiculous amount of money at some other soccer-related cause. (The Nooner's un-asked-for, dramatic prediction of the day: If it's here, we win. No questions asked.)

Mexico (6-1) -- The pluses: One final run at home for Borgetti, who might never retire; cheap drugs; Jorge Campos would almost certainly play a prominent role in the festivities.
The minuses: Everyone who enters Azteca immediately gets the Black Lung; Drinking Corona and Tecate for three straight weeks would get old real fast; Bad things happen in Mexico. Haven't you ever seen Laguna Beach or The O.C.?

Dark horse candidate that the Nooner is unaware of because he barely did any research to write this post (10-1) -- The title pretty much says it all.

Canada (1 trillion-1) -- Seriously? It's f-ing Canada. The only reason the odds are so low is because the Nooner couldn't find the infinity symbol on his keyboard. Go play hockey, Canucks.

Belize (Not gonna happen) -- But how awesome would that be? The Nooner can dream, can't he? He'd be there in a heartbeat, wearing his thong bathing suit. (On second thought, it's probably a good thing it won't happen.)

Published giovedì 1 marzo 2007 20.36 by Nooner
Filed Under:

Comments

 

playityourway said:

2018: England is the only choice, the best stadiums, the best fans.  Hooliganism doesn't happen in England only when they go abroad and that has decresed dramaticaly in the past 3 major internation events.  The weather will suit all teams, and will leave and even playing ground.  Having  the World Cup in South Africa, or Brazil is just stupid, its far to hot for a large percentage of teams and a huge strain on players.  Yes Brazil are the best and they are fantastic hoasts with amazingly colour fans.  But the conditions don't make for a every fair competetion.  

The other contenders for 2018, USA they had it in 94.  Would be good for promoting the game over there, and the increased poluatrity already with Beckahm gone who knows.  Mexico, just no same problem with Brazil its too hot.  And would be very expensive travling for Europeans, African and such.
marzo 2, 2007 23.28
 

Kink_G8 said:

Mexico isn't hot at all compared to Brazil, the problem here is there are only 3 or 4 stadiums good enough too host a WC..
It is expensive for us to travel to Europe or Africa too you know.. I don't know how much a plane ticket costs from Europe to Mexico.. but I know that from Mex to Europe costs at least 1000 Euros..
agosto 23, 2007 2.46
Anonymous comments are disabled
Click here to respond after logging-on
<marzo 2007>
lumamegivesado
2627281234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

News

Click HERE for the Nooner's regular column on Goal.com!

Click HERE to email the Nooner.